Friday, June 22, 2018

Fiction Friday: Hiring an Editor

My journey toward publication has been loaded with new learning opportunities. One of the biggest was choosing a content, or developmental, editor. This is both because this selection has the most impact on the quality of the book(s) I will put out, and because it’s the single biggest expense in the self-publishing journey.
The problem was, I didn’t really understand what a content editor would do. I knew they weren’t the same as a copy editor, who would look for problems with grammar and wording. Content editors work at a more macro level—they’re concerned with characters and plot.
But I still didn’t understand exactly what that meant.
Were they just a glorified (and paid) version of the critique group I’d had for so long? Or something more? What should I expect? How would I even begin to tell a good one from mediocre one or even a bad one?
A.E. Jones, who won the 2014 Golden Heart® for her paranormal romance, Mind Sweeper, did a series of blog posts on choosing a developmental editor. The posts are smart and incisive and will take you through a well-defined and repeatable process to make a smart hire. The first post is here.
I read A.E.’s posts, and I’d like to tell you that I followed her well laid out process, but I didn’t. I still felt unqualified to make a wise selection. Once I got the sample edits back, they’d probably disagree with each other. How would I know which editor was right?
Meanwhile, one of the 2015 Golden Heart® finalists, Arlene McFarlane, self-published her novel, Murder, Curlers and Cream. It’s a comedy/murder mystery/slow-burn romance. Arlene had problems finding a home for it in traditional publishing because it straddled sub-genres. Since this is also true of The Demon Always Wins, it occurred to me that maybe Arlene’s editor might work for my book, too.
So, I read Murder, Curlers and Cream. It’s a fun read and I recommend it, but for purposes of this discussion, what I was looking for was plot holes and inconsistent or poorly-motivated characters. I didn’t find that. The book was solid. And Arlene had nothing but praise for her editor, Karen Dale Harris.
So, without getting so much as a sample edit, I hired Karen. I got a little frustrated that it took longer to get the edit back than I expected (more on that next week when I talk about the perils of scheduling a release in the self-pub world), but when it arrived I was completely satisfied.
Also, a little overwhelmed.
Karen’s edit came in two pieces: a thirty (30!) page edit report and a markup of my 400 page manuscript. The markup included some copy editing as well as Karen pointing out plot holes and inconsistencies.
The edit report, though, was what finally helped me understand what a really good editor can do for you. Karen went through and summarized all the plot holes, all the weak (or non-existent) motivations and all the inconsistencies she found while combing through the manuscript. She also offered suggestions for addressing them.
She also spent some time explaining some really basic things about what romance readers look for—like, a book that’s primarily about a couple falling in love, rather than the nuts and bolts of how one might run a free clinic. (Setting is important, but it can’t  be allowed to overwhelm the story.)
In particular, I knew that the book wasn’t as sexy as I wanted it to be. Karen offered very practical (and mostly subtle) suggestions to correct that.
I’m sure that once the book is out in the world, my readers will tell me a thousand things that could be better about it, but I’m thrilled with where I wound up, with the help of my editor.
I just got the second book in the series, The Demon’s in the Details, back from Karen. The edit report is only half as long, in part because I took a lot of what I learned from working with her on the first book and built it into the second one from the start.
So, what would I recommend for a first-time author who is going the self-publishing route and needs to hire a content editor?
  1. Don’t skip the developmental edit. Neither you nor your critique partners know enough to create a strong book that is worthy of asking someone to spend money to buy it.
  2. Follow A.E. Jones process. You may be able to shoot from the hip and get lucky, but there’s a better chance you won’t.
  3. Recognize that there’s a learning curve to this, just like there has been with every other step along your writing path. You may not get lucky and get a great editor right out of the box, as I did, but even if you don’t, you’ll learn something from the experience.
  4. As far as the sample edits, since the first pages of the book are the most important in terms of hooking your reader, see what your prospective editors have to say about those. Ideally, at least one of them will say something that will give you an ah-ha! moment. If she does, grab her!

2 comments:

  1. Excellent description of the process. Lots of things I had never thought about until our discussions along our hiking trails.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are on a interesting journey! :)

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for visiting The Raisin Chronicles. Jeanne responds to every comment via personal email.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails